Cars vs Pedestrians

| 4 Comments

After reading an article in Gazet Van Antwerpen about the amount of time pedestrians have to wait before they get a green light to cross the street, I started thinking. After tests were conducted, it turned out pedestrians had to wait an average of 1 minute to get a green light at a crossroad, and in some cases even up to three minutes.

I'm not a traffic analist, nor do I know anything about how these things work, but I do participate in traffic on a daily base, just like most of us. I use both a car, my bike and I'm often a pedestrian too. Feedback on the following idea would be much appreciated, especially if you know why it would or would not work in real life.

Right now trafic lights default to a red light for pedestrians and a green light for cars. This means that cars have right of way in most cases and the traffic stream is only interrupted when a pedestrian requests it. While in some cases it does make sense (ie. high car traffic, very low pedestrians crossing), it doesn't make sense at all in the center of a city, where there are tons of pedestrians, mixed with an equally large (or even less) amount of cars. In that case, I'd suggest that the traffic light defaults to a green for pedestrians - giving them right of way - and let the cars make the request to interrupt the stream.

Yes, just turn it around! Why not? In a city speeds are limited anyway, there are tons of pedestrians and it would make a nice change. Have you ever stood in front of a traffic light for a minute while rain is pouring down, while people in their car, sitting dry and comfortable, race by? The pedestrian is the less protected against the elements here, so why not give them the benefits?

Don't get me wrong here, as I'm not against car traffic at all. There is a place and time for everything, and I drive a car myself as well. I do think though that in certain cases and situations, it would be better to shift the default around.

So, what do you think about it?

4 Comments

In your explanation you forget one minor thingy. In for example Antwerp, there are few pedestrians that actually don't cross the street when they have a red light. Most people just ignore, wether it is red or green.

I agree, but why would you make new rules for people that don't follow them anyway? What I mean is that you don't have to include those people in your analysis if you ask me.

Come on people?! Am I that confusing, boring or is my idea so dumb no one even wants to think about it? I don't believe that none of you even gave it a thought and have nothing to say about it. If that were the case two things could be the cause :

1. my idea is unreal/dumb/impossible
2. no one can follow my absolutely genius ideas.

So far I'm going for the latter, except if someone proves me wrong.

I still don't think that it is a good idea.
1) not everybody crosses the road at a traffic light

2) if it's longer red for the cars, I think you'll get enormous traffic jams. Because: what will you do at an X-crossing. There will always be a green light in one direction, so the other cars will just be standing there because the green light for the pedestrians also counts for the light referring to the cars that are going in the same direction.

Monthly Archives

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.04

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by ServMe published on May 8, 2004 5:51 PM.

Starship Troopers 2 - Hero of the Federation was the previous entry in this blog.

Certainly not the end is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.